Chapter 1 The Nature of Research
DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-51-7-2770 | ISBN: PBK |
Published: September 2015 | Component type: chapter |
Published in: Research Methods for Business and Management 2nd edn | Parent DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-51-7-2735 |
Abstract
Whilst it is true that we have been organizing and managing in social groups since our earliest days as hunter-gatherers, the formal study of management only emerged at the start of the last century. This chapter examines the nature of management research, contrasting the view that the purpose of management research is to influence the practice of managers with the view that management is simply an interesting social phenomenon. These views are connected to two views of knowledge production, known as mode 1 and mode 2 research. The paper then concludes with advice on how to assess the quality of management research.
Sample content
Contributors
- Robert MacIntosh, Heriot-Watt University (Author) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-1840
- Nigel Caldwell, Heriot-Watt University (Author)
For the source title:
- Kevin D O'Gorman, Heriot-Watt University (Editor) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-6619
- Robert MacIntosh, Heriot-Watt University (Editor) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7333-0201
Cite as
MacIntosh & Caldwell, 2015
MacIntosh, R. & Caldwell, N. (2015) "Chapter 1 The Nature of Research" In: O'Gorman, K.D. & MacIntosh, R. (ed) . Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-910158-51-7-2770
Save, bookmark or recommend
 Save on Mendeley |  Share on Twitter |  Share on LinkedIn |  Share on Facebook |
References
Baumeister, R.F. (1996) quoted in Bedian, AG (1996). Thoughts on making and remaking of the management discipline. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 311-318
Day, N.E. (2011). The silent majority: Manuscript rejection and its impact on scholars, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10 (4), 704u2013718
https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0027
Extejt, M.M., Smith, J.E. (1990). The behavioral sciences and management: An evaluation of relevant journals. Journal of Management. 16(3), 539-551
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600302
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London
Hambrick, D.C., Abrahamson, E. (1995). What if the Academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Journal 38(5), 1427-1441.
https://doi.org/10.2307/256864
Kelemen, M., Bansal, P. (2002). The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management. 13(2), 97-109.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00225
Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 115-136
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.x
MacLean, D., MacIntosh, R., & Grant, S. (2002). Mode 2 management research. British Journal of Management. 13(3), 189-207.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00237
Mintzberg, H. (2004) Managers not MBAs: a hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. Berrett-Koehler: San Francisco.
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (1998). Rationality in an Uncertain World. Psychology Press: Hove, England.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203345955
Peteraf, M., Di Stefano, G. and Verona, G. (2013) The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together, Strategic Management Journal, 34(12): 1389-1410.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2078
Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620
https://doi.org/10.2307/258592
Roehrich, Lewis, & George (2014, p. 111) Sharplin, A.D., & Mabry, R.H. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in management research. Human Relations, 38(2), 139-149
https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800204
Smith, R.D., & Robey, D. (1973). Research and applications in operations management: Discussion of a paradox. Academy of Management Journal. 16(4), 647-657.
https://doi.org/10.2307/254697
Susman, G.I., & Evered, R.D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly. 23(4), 582-603
https://doi.org/10.2307/2392581
Tranfield, D., & Starkey, K. (1998). The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: towards policy. British Journal of Management, 9, 341-353
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00103