Chapter 7 Governmental Approach to Major Events in New Zealand
DOI: 10.23912/978-1-911396-91-8-4187 | ISBN: 978-1-911396-91-8 |
Published: September 2019 | Component type: chapter |
Published in: Event Portfolio Management | Parent DOI: 10.23912/978-1-911396-91-8-4260 |
Abstract
For the past 20 years, New Zealand, a country relatively remote in geographi- cal terms, has been actively communicating with the international visitor market in order to construct a global brand for the country. As a tourist destination, New Zealand offers an impressive range of natural and cultural attractions, out- door activities, urban tourism and a diverse event calendar. In 2017, the country welcomed 3.7m visitors, with the market forecast to grow by 7.5% in 2018. The active role of the Government in the visitor economy makes New Zealand an attractive investment destination. Extensive marketing campaigns, significant expansion of transport connections, private investment in infrastructure and the hotel sector indicate that New Zealand will continue its sustainable tourism growth over the coming years. Major events have been recognised as a powerful and successful instrument that can brand the country directly to the target audience. The ever-increasing numbers of international event visitors to New Zealand, as well as recent success in securing bids for such large-scale international events as 2011 Rugby World Cup, 2015 ICC Cricket World Cup, 2015 FIFA U-20 World cup and 2017 World Master Games, demonstrate the relevance of the employed strategy. This chapter reviews a national event portfolio approach in New Zealand. The approach is characterised by a strong top-down orientation, where the Govern- ment plays the leading role in determining current economic and socio-cultural objectives for the major event industry, implementation of the national event strategy and evaluation of the investment in major events. The data for this chap- ter have been collected by document selection and analysis and by interviewing several industry experts.
Sample content
Contributors
- Vladimir Antchak, University of Derby (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1395-4391
- Vassilios Ziakas, Plymouth Marjon University (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1501-7863
- Donald Getz, University of Calgary (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-8012
For the source title:
- Vladimir Antchak, University of Derby (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1395-4391
- Vassilios Ziakas, Plymouth Marjon University (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1501-7863
- Donald Getz, University of Calgary (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-8012
Cite as
Antchak, Ziakas & Getz, 2019
Antchak, V., Ziakas, V. & Getz, D. (2019) "Chapter 7 Governmental Approach to Major Events in New Zealand" In: Antchak, V., Ziakas, V. & Getz, D. (ed) . Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-911396-91-8-4187
References
Antchak, V., & Pernecky, T. (2017). Major events programming in a city: Comparing three approaches to portfolio design. Event Management, 21(5), 545-561. doi:10.3727/152599517X15053272359013
https://doi.org/10.3727/152599517X15053272359013
Cabinet Office, Wellington. (2004). Government major event strategy. Wellington, New Zealand: Cabinet Economic Development Committee. Retrieved from http://www.med.govt.nz/majorevents/pdf-library/nz-major-events/strategy-documents/major-events-strategy-2004
Cabinet Office, Wellington. (2009). Changes to the Government's approach to major events. Wellington, New Zealand: Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure. Retrieved from http://www.med.govt.nz/majorevents/pdf-library/nz-major-events/strategy-documents/changes-to-governemnt-approach-event-policy
Cabinet Office, Wellington. (2016). Evaluation of the Major Events Development Fund. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.majorevents.govt.nz/pdf-library/nz-major-events/strategy-documents/evaluation-of-the-major-events-development-fund-cabinet-paper.pdf
Getz, D. (2008). Event tourism: Definition, evolution, and research. Tourism Management, 29(3), 403-428. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.017
Kelly, D. M., & Fairley, S. (2018). The utility of relationships in the creation and maintenance of an event portfolio. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(2), 260-275. Retrieved from doi:10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0270
https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0270
Major Events. (2016). Leverage and Legacy Planning. Retrieved from http://www.majorevents.govt.nz/resource-bank/leverage-and-legacy-planning/definition
Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment of New Zealand. (2010). New Zealand major events strategy. Retrieved from http://www.med.govt.nz/majorevents/pdf-library/nz-major-events/strategy-documents/ME-strategy. pdf
Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment of New Zealand. (2013). Economic evaluation outcomes: Major events development fund. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.med.govt.nz/majorevents/pdf-library/news/MEDF-evaluation-report.pdf
Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand. (2007). Operation of the major events development fund: Evaluation report. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.med.govt.nz/majorevents/pdf-library/nz-major-events/strategy-documents/evaluation-Major-Events-development-fund-2007.pdf
Parvatiyar, A. & Sheth, J. N. (2000) The domain and conceptual foundations of relationship marketing. In J. N. Sheth & A. Parvatiyar (Eds.), Handbook of Relationship Marketing (pp. 3-38). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231310.n1
Smith, A. (2012). Events and Urban Regeneration: The strategic use of events to revitalise cities. New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136997