Chapter 3 Leader follower perspectives
DOI: 10.23912/9781911635253-4876 | ISBN: 9781911635253 |
Published: May 2021 | Component type: chapter |
Published in: Event Leadership | Parent DOI: 10.23912/9781911635253-4274 |
Abstract
As we saw in the previous chapter, classic approaches to understanding leadership all shared the view that leadership is a specialised role – they focused on the individual and, whilst some of these theories looked at what other influences there may be (i.e. the situational context), they did so through the lens of the primary leader, carrying out leadership functions. This then can be seen as their one key limitation – they are leadercentric and don’t tend to recognise followers’ characteristics or initiatives (Uhl-Bien, Riggio, Lowe, & Carsten, 2014). This focus on the ‘heroic leader’ has, over the last 50 years, become increasingly criticised, as researchers began to look at leadership behaviours from a influence perspective, considering the dynamics of the leader-follower behaviours and leadership styles that might influence or change the behaviours of their followers or work subordinates. As Burns (1978) suggested, at this point, we knew a lot about leaders, whilst knowing very little about leadership. The body of work that grew out of such observations was largely concerned with what became known as charismatic and transactional /transformational leadership (Bass, 1985). Here scholars had started to focus on leadership styles – what is it that leaders do that makes them effective – and on the impact the leader has on their followers.
Sample content
Contributors
- Emma Abson, Sheffield Hallam University (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-4216
For the source title:
- Dr Emma Abson, Sheffield Hallam University (Author) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-4216
Cite as
Abson, 2021
Abson, E. (2021) "Chapter 3 Leader follower perspectives" In: Abson, D.E. (ed) . Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/9781911635253-4876
References
Alexander, A., Kim, S.B. & Kim, D.Y. (2015) Segmenting volunteers by motivation in the 2012 London Olympic Games. Tourism Management, 47, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.002
Badaracco, J. (2001). We don't need another hero. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 120-126.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: The Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux. Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463-478.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90021-7
Bass, B. M. & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, research & managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Bryman, A. (1992) Charisma and Leadership in Organisations. London: Sage.
Burns, J. (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper Row.
Chaleff, I. (1995). The Courageous Follower: Standing up to and for our leaders. San Francisco,CA: Barrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Chaleff, I. (2008). Creating new ways of following. The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. In Riggio, R. E., Chaleff, I., & Lipman-Blumen, J.(Eds.). The Art of Followership: How great followers create great leaders and organizations. (1st ed., pp. 67-87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Conger, J.A. (1989) The Charismatic Leader: Behind the Mystique of Exceptional Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Conger, J.A. & Kanungo, R.N. (1987) Toward a behavioural theory: Char- ismatic leadership in organisational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12: 637-647.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306715
Conger, J.A. & Kanungo, R.N. (1998) Charismatic Leadership in Organisa- tions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dansereau, F., Graen, G. & Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organisations: a longitudinal investigation of the role-making process. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
Deale, C.S. Shoffstall, D.G. & Brown, E.A. (2016) What does it mean to follow? An exploration of a followship profile in hospitality and tourism. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 16
https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2016.1180964
(4) 235-252. Dinh, J., Lord, R.G., Gardner, W.L., Meuser, J.D., Liden, R.C. & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L. & Ferris,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759. doi:10.1177/0149206311415280.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
Gertsner, C. R. & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader- member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
Graen, G. (2003). Role making onto the starting work team using LMX leadership: diversity as an asset. In G. Graen (Ed.), New Frontiers of Leadership (pp. 33-66). Greenwich: Information Age.
Graen, G. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995a). Development of Leader-Member exchange theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995b). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C. & Chaudry, C. (2009). LMX Differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 517-534.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. & Morgeson, F. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviours: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269-277.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
Judge, T.A. & Piccolo, R.F. (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology. 80(5), 755-768.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
Kaplan, R. E. (1984). Trade routes: The manager's network of relationships. Organisational Dynamics, 12(4), 37-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(84)90010-X
Kramer, M. W. (2006). Communication strategies for sharing leadership within a creative team: LMX in theatre groups. In G. Graen & J. A. Graen (Eds.), Sharing Network Leadership. USA: IPA.
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J. & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader- Member exchange, differentiation and task interdependence: implications for individuals and group performance. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 27(6), 723-746.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.409
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A. & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and performance: a metaâ€analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121. doi:10.1111/peps.12100.
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100
Megheirkouni, M. (2017). Revisiting leader-member exchange theory: insights into stadia management. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 8(3), 244-260.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-03-2017-0022
Megheirkouni, M. (2018). Leadership and decision-making styles in large scale sporting events. Event Management, 22, 785-801.
https://doi.org/10.3727/152599518X15299559876162
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.
Northouse, P. (2017). Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Parent, M., Beaupre, R. & Seguin, B. (2009). Key leadership qualities for major sporting events: The case of the World Aquatics Championships. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 6(4), 367-388.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2009.029300
Parent, M., Olver, D. & Seguin, B. (2009). Understanding leadership in major sporting events: The case of the 2005 World Aquatics Championships. Sports Management Review, 12(3), 167-184.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2009.01.004
Pearce, C.L., Sims, H.P. & Cox, J.F. (2002) Can a leader be both transactional and transformational? An empirical analysis using latent class modelling. Working paper, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.
Rosenbach, W. E. & Taylor, R. L. (2006). Contemporary Issues in Leadership (6th ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Schedlitzki, D. & Edwards, G. (2018) Studying Leadership: Traditional and critical approaches. 2nd Ed. London: Sage.
Schofield, P., Crowther, P., Jago, L., Heeley, K. & Taylor, S., (2018) Collaborative innovation: catalyst for a destination's event success. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(6) 2499-2518.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0396
Sparrowe, R. T. & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in Leader- Member Exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522-552. doi:10.2307/259332.
https://doi.org/10.2307/259332
Stern, J. & Stokes, S. (2019) Why Britain should be aware of charismatic leaders offering Brexit solutions. The Conversation, 8th May. https://theconversation.com/why-britain-should-beware-of-charismatic- leaders-promising-easy-brexit-solutions-116677.
Stern, J. & Stokes, S. (2020) Boris Johnson needs to show a 'post- heroic' style of leadership now. The Conversation, April 27. https://theconversation.com/boris-johnson-needs-to-show-a-post-heroic-style- of-leadership-now-137299
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R., Lowe, K. B. & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership Theory: a review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83-104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007
Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organisations. New York: Free Press.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transforma- tional and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2
Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behaviour: what we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0088